Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches

  • Idiographic approach
    • Study of unique experience
      • Aims to describe nature of the individual
      • People studied as unique entities with their own subjective experiences/motivators/values
      • No attempt to compare to a larger group/standard/norm
    • Qualitative research methods
      • Case studies/unstructured interviews/self-report techniques
      • Reflects aim to describe richness of human experience/gain insight into individual’s unique way of thinking
    • g. humanistic psychology
      • Interested in documenting conscious experience of the individual rather than producing general laws of behaviour
    • g. the psychodynamic approach
      • Freud’s use of the case study method
      • However, also assumed he had universal laws of behaviour/personality development
  • Nomothetic approach
    • Production of general laws
      • Benchmark against which people can be compared/classified/measured
      • Future behaviour can be predicted/controlled
    • Associated with reliable/scientific tests
      • g. questionnaires/psychological tests
      • Studies of larger numbers of people
        • How they are similar/how they differ
      • g. behaviourism
        • Studied responses of hundreds of animals to develop laws of learning
      • g. cognitive approach
        • Infer structure/processes of human memory
          • Measuring performance of large samples of people in lab tests
        • g. biological approach
          • Conducted countless brain scans to make generalisations about localisation of function
  • Idiographic approach provides rich data
    • Complete/global account of the individual
      • g. case study of HM
    • Single case may generate hypotheses for further study
      • g. HM: helped understanding that some procedural memories are more resistant to amnesia
    • Reveals important insights about normal functioning which may contribute to our overall understanding of behaviour
  • Idiographic approach: lack of scientific rigour
    • Supporters may have to acknowledge subjective/restrictive nature of their work
    • Freud: many key concepts were largely developed from detailed study of a single case
      • g. Little Hans and the Oedipus complex
    • Meaningful generalisations cannot be made without further examples
      • Conclusions tend to rely on subjective interpretation of the researcher
      • Open to bias
  • Nomothetic approach: scientific value of research
    • More scientific processes
      • Mirror those employed within natural sciences
    • Include standardised procedures, assessing reliability/validity, using statistical analysis to demonstrate significance
    • Gives psychology greater credibility