Holism and Reductionism

  • Holism
    • People/behaviour should be studied as a whole system
    • Gestalt psychologists: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts
      • Breaking up behaviour/experience is inappropriate as they can only be understood by analysing the person/behaviour as a whole
    • View shared by humanistic psychology
      • g. effective therapy is bringing together all aspects of the whole person
    • Cognitive approach
      • Memory is a complex system understood through connected networks
        • Whole network behaves differently to the individual parts
  • Reductionism
    • Breaking down behaviour into constituent parts
      • Smaller units
    • Based on scientific principle of parsimony
      • All phenomena should be explained using the most basic/lowest level/simplest principles
        • g. behaviour of individual cells
  • Levels of explanations
    • There are different ways of viewing the same phenomena in psychology
      • Some more reductionist than others
    • g. OCD may be explained in different ways
      • Socio-cultural: behaviour most would regard as odd
        • Obsessive hand washing
      • Psychological: experience of having obsessive thoughts
      • Physical: sequence of movements involved in washing hands
      • Physiological: hypersensitivity of the basal ganglia
      • Neurochemical: underproduction of serotonin
    • Best explanation is debatable
    • Each level more reductionist than the one before
  • Psychology can be placed on a hierarchy of reductionism/science
    • More precise at the bottom
      • g. physics
    • More general at the top
      • g. sociology
    • Researchers who favour reductionism see psychology being replaced by explanations derived from sciences lower down in the hierarchy
  • Biological reductionism
    • Physiological/neurochemical level
    • All behaviour is to some level biological
      • Also: evolutionary/genetic influence
    • Successfully applied to explanation/treatment of mental illnesses
      • g. effects of psychoactive drugs on the brain have contributed to our understanding of neural processes/how to explain OCD/depression/schizophrenia
  • Environmental reductionism
    • Basis of behaviourist approach
      • Study observable behaviour
      • Break complex learning up into stimulus-response links
    • Key analysis takes place at physical level
      • Not concerned with cognitive processes (psychological level’
      • Mind = black box
        • Irrelevant to our understanding of behaviour
  • Holism can explain key aspects of social behaviour
    • Some social behaviours only emerge within a group context
      • Cannot be understood at the level of individual members
    • g. Stanford prison experiment
      • De-individualisation of prisoners/guards could not be understood by studying the participants as individuals
      • Interactions between the people matters
    • Holistic explanations are needed for a more complete understanding of behaviour
  • Holism is impractical
    • Explanations tend not to lend themselves to rigorous scientific testing
      • Become vague/speculative as they become more complex
    • g. if we accept there are many factors contributing to depression it is difficult to establish which is most influential
      • Which to use as a basis for therapy?
    • Suggests that reductionist approaches may be better when finding solutions for real-world problems
  • Reductionism: scientific credibility
    • Approach often forms basis of scientific research
      • Target behaviours reduced to constituent parts to produce operationalised variables
    • Makes it possible to conduct experiments/record observations in meaningful/reliable ways
    • Gives psychology greater credibility
      • Equal terms with natural sciences