- TURNOUT
- Since compulsory voting was introduced to Australia in 1924, turnout has never dropped below 91%.
- This would increase the legitimacy of elected representatives as declining turnout undermines the democratic process, particularly in local by-elections, where turnout in 2014 was mostly around 20 or 30%.
- The state already requires people to do much more onerous things than to turn up at a polling station.
- Citizens’ rights are not affected by compulsory voting as they can go to the polling station and submit a blank ballot rather than actually vote for any candidate.
- Politicians and parties would have to pay attention to all groups of voters rather than just the better off and better educated who tend to be the ones that vote.
- Inequality would be reduced through re-engaging disenfranchised communities.
- VALUE OF VOTE
- Many people who choose not to do so because they feel their vote is powerless.
- And under the current Westminster voting system, they would be right – In the 2017 General Election there were 22 million wasted votes – or 68% of the total.
- There is little evidence from countries that have compulsory voting that their electorates are more interested/engaged in politics – some voters would make a random choice on the ballot paper because they have to vote.
- NOT A SOLUTION
- It does not promote real democratic engagement
- just turns voting into one more thing that the state requires us to do.
- it needs to be more than just ticking a box, people need to be engaged with political decision-making in order to ensure representatives are working for the common good.
- The failure of people to vote may indicate satisfaction
- g. it could be said that the decline in turnout from 1997 to 2001 indicated that many voters were happy with the expected Labour victory and saw no need to vote.
- The turnout is higher when the electorate are not happy with the status quo, such as in the 2010 General Election, which had a turnout of 65.1%.
