Watson and Rayner, Little Albert Study (1920) – Classic Study

Aim

  • To see if they could condition fear of an animal by simultaneously presenting the animal and striking a steel bar to make a loud noise and frighten the child
  • The fear would be transferred to other animals and objects
  • There would be an effect of time on the conditioned response

Procedure

  • Lab experiment using a single participant: a male infant aged 9 months
  • Assessed on his response to a number of objects, including a white rat, and displayed no initial fear
  • Two months later he was again presented with the white rat. When he reached for the rat the researcher struck a four-foot metal bar behind his head, making a loud noise and frightening the child
  • The procedure was repeated five times a week later and twice more 17 days later

Results

  • First trial: displayed some distress, jumping violently and sticking his face into the mattress
  • Second trail: suspicious of the rat
  • Third trial: leaned away from the rat when it was presented
  • When a rabbit was placed next to him, the child cried
  • 7 weeks later the child cried in response to a variety of white furry objects

Conclusion

  • Stimulus generalisation shows that Albert transferred the fear to other similar stimuli
  • CR still occurred 31 days later so concluded that it may last a lifetime
  • Mother removed him before he could be unconditioned

Before Conditioning

Rat (NS) = No response

Noise of bar (UCS) = Fear shown by crying (UCR)

During Conditioning

Rat (NS) + Noise (UCS) = Fear (UCR)

After Conditioning

Rat (CS) = Fear (CR)

Evaluation Summary

  • G – low – one ppt – findings are unique to him
  • R – high – standardised procedure (7 episodes of joint stimulation) – replicable
  • R – low – study was not replicated due to ethical issues – no research support
  • A – yes – understanding of development of fears – use this to treat fears
  • V – low – no control group – cause and effect cannot be determined
  • V – low ecological – lab – unnatural response
  • V – low – observations were subjective – at risk of researcher bias
  • E – low – not protected from harm – was not unconditioned